
Thunderbird has gained more solid users for corporates user than for home user. It’s “sharing the platform” from an ecosystem perspective (security measures and maintainability).įor Thunderbird’s rendering engine, Gecko (Rust) is sufficient. Thunderbird is based on Firefox ESR, but due to the nature of email clients, the superiority or inferiority of the rendering engine is meaningless. In other words, if there are users who need it, the possibility of evolution and prosperity cannot be denied. If AI evolves, will Organism become useless?Īfter all, the significance of their existence is beyond the reach of human intelligence. Without Google, Mozilla would be even worse off than they are the downfall of firefox, I believe thunderbird should make a migration to chromium based. Google does the opposite of “betraying” Mozilla, they are granting them 90% of their annual income. When MS created Bing, Chrome hit the market at around the same time, and it would have brought down IE no matter what. Mozilla is irrelevant today, and things are not looking too rosy:Īnyhow, Google would still be what it is today even if Firefox never existed, because guess what search engine Internet Explorer was defaulting to back in the day? Google. Although a clear trend was visible ever since 2008. The journalists or whatever proclaiming Firefox dead in 2008 were not the brightest of candles, whether or not something is dying can be determined by the market share, and Firefox didn’t have a small market share back then. And yes, the decline is still continuing.

It exists, but please refrain from calling it “relevant”. Firefox, and Mozilla itself still exists 20+ years SaundersĪnd by “exist” you mean a fringe existence with, like, 4% market share: Google betrayed a friendship and partnership that it had with Mozilla.Īround the time that Google dropped the “Don’t be evil†mantra. Google paid for it’s default position in Firefox and for clicks, but it was exposure to Firefox’s millions of users that fed Google, paid Google, and, made Google what it is now. If it were not for Mozilla/Firefox, Google itself would not be what it is today.
#THUNDERBIRD EMAIL SOFTWARE#
Most of it was due to bias, pay-outs to a-hem, “journalists”, and blanket and intrusive, unwanted installations via 3rd party software and highly aggressive campaigns by Google to promote, install, and brainwash people into using Chrome, and here’s something that no one, besides myself has ever addressed. I’ve heard that Firefox is dead since Chrome hit the scene. “Firefox: An endangered internet species?”īy Steven J. “An incredibly shrinking Firefox faces endangered species status”īy Gregg Keizer, Senior Reporter, Computerworld | 9:09 am PST “With Chrome Ascendant, Mozilla Is a Dead Man Walking” And, just run a search for the quoted text for validation if need be, but you should use Bing.īy Sebastian Anthony on February 9, 2012”

Drop the Mork database format that is used in address book data, the folder message indexing cache, and Panacea.dat.Thunderbird could become the first major email client to support the protocol. Implement one protocol in JavaScript and make it usable in Thunderbird.Also, Thunderbird will move away from XUL documents towards top-level (X)HTML windows. Conversion from individual XUL elements to HTML will continue.Move the localization platform to Fluent, the same that Firefox migrated to.Performance of the client needs to be improved in various areas, and system integration needs to get better as well. The client could get a troubleshooter specifically for helping users when emails cannot be sent or retrieved. Thunderbird will support more MailExtensions APIs that extension developers may use to create add-ons for the email client.
